Skip to main content
why tsakaniqa

Stop hiring your way out of the coverage gap.

Coverage stuck near 20% against an 80% target is not a headcount problem — it\u2019s a coverage problem. We read your actual code, generate the suite, and your people keep the gate.

01 — who it\u2019s for

Three roles. One coverage problem.

Different mandates, same gap. Each persona below is met where they are.

D — The Delivery-Accountable Testing Head

Coverage stuck near 20% against an 80% target, and she cannot hire her way out: QA recruitment succeeds 10–20% of the time.

When one tester is sick or unavailable, the whole release train stops.
P — The Portfolio-Wide Technology Executive

No single view of quality across the portfolio — stitching twelve team reports into one board answer.

If I invest hours into a feature and it ships substandard, I’ve lost that investment.
R — The Risk-Exposed Compliance Engineer

A manual tester missed a fee-calculation error; the business repaid clients millions.

When the business finds issues my framework should have caught, I’ve already lost.
02 — why tsakaniqa

Three reasons the math changes.

The platform, the coverage, and the cost — each pillar stands on its own.

01

Your people become the quality gatekeepers

The platform runs generation, execution, and reporting; your people approve what matters and keep the gate. Buyers skip the six-month ramp new automation hires need — without replacing anyone. The single point of failure disappears because the workflow no longer lives in one specialist’s head.

02

Coverage that reads the actual code

Tests are generated from the codebase itself, closing the gaps manual testers structurally miss — including defects that sat undetected for years. A quality gate catches issues before your members ever see them.

03

We beat the true cost of human QA

Avoid the rework cost before a feature reaches production. No double-cost trap of paying for QA and then paying again to fix what it missed. Verify first with a paid proof-of-value pilot and a contractual Coverage Guarantee.

03 — objections

The objections we hear first.

Asked in every conversation. Answered straight.

It’s too expensive.

The comparison isn’t rate to rate, it’s total cost to outcome. Like-for-like ownership of your estate is two to three specialists plus licences. We land well below that stack, with a guarantee.

We already have a tool.

This isn’t a replacement for what you’ve implemented. It’s the ownership and reporting layer your tooling still requires a team to operate — the scan demonstrates capability in days, not months.

We don’t want AI near live data.

You shouldn’t, and we don’t ask you to. Nothing merges and nothing touches production without your people signing off. The entire solution runs inside your own environment under your own governance, with no external data exposure or unapproved technologies.

What about our IP?

Generated test suites are yours in perpetuity. Fully documented, independently runnable — no vendor lock-in.

Own your quality. Ship with confidence.

Start with a paid two-week proof-of-value pilot, credited in full if you proceed. The Coverage Guarantee: 80% automated coverage within four months, or the fees pause.